Have something to say?

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you. For Support reach out at hello@lamatic.ai.

Planned

Support for Local Development

An open-source SDK to address developer adoption barriers and vendor lock-in concerns that are currently limiting growth. Problem Developers resist Lamatic's no-code/low-code platform due to limited library support, lack of local development capabilities, missing CLI tools, and weak version control integration Enterprise and startup customers worry about vendor lock-in and business continuity if Lamatic changes pricing or discontinues service Competitors offering open-source alternatives have an advantage Proposed Solution Build a standalone, open-source SDK enabling developers to: Develop AI agents/systems locally in their preferred IDE Test and debug offline without cloud dependency Use Git for version control across all project components Create custom integrations and capabilities Deploy anywhere (on-premise, private/public cloud, or Lamatic-managed) Compile flows into executable code via CI/CD pipelines Core Architecture YAML-based configuration system with: Pre-built node libraries for AI components Containerized runtime (Pod + Core) executing configurations Compiler for optimizing YAML into executable workers Local web editor accessible via localhost CLI for all development operations Multiple invocation methods (API, webhooks, widgets)

Aman Sharma About 1 month ago

πŸ’‘ Feature Requests

Planned

Enhance Flow Comparison

Multi-tab Support and Flow Comparison Enable right-click to open flows in new tabs for easy comparison Support multiple tabs within the main window (similar to how Linear handles native apps) Display full flow names - currently get cut off/truncated in the UI, making it difficult to distinguish between flows Allow side-by-side visual comparison of different flow versions Consider implementing an Electron wrapper for native app experience with better tab support Cross-Environment Flow Navigation Ability to change environments within a single flow view - users want to see what the same flow looks like in staging while viewing production Maintain flow state when switching environments instead of returning to flow home screen Use flow slug associations to link flows across environments (dev/staging/production) Reduce manual effort required to promote workflows from dev β†’ staging β†’ production

Aman Sharma 8 days ago

πŸ’‘ Feature Requests

Planned

Support For dynamic File References in Flow Config

The nodes are embedded inline with formatting artifacts (hello\\nhello), apparent test content, and no versioning metadata. Editing it requires understanding the entire config file, and changes produce noisy diffs that obscure actual prompt improvements. Before: prompts: - id: 187c2f4b-c23d-4545-abef-73dc897d6b7b role: assistant content: >- hello hello Important:please provide the response in wrap text format... After: prompts: - id: rag_system_prompt_v1 role: assistant # Edit prompts in /prompts/rag_system.md β€” supports preview & versioning contentRef: ./prompts/rag_system.md version: "1.2.0" lastUpdated: "2025-01-15" Developer Impact: Prompts become first-class artifacts β€” reviewable in PRs, A/B testable, and editable without touching pipeline config.

Aman Sharma About 1 month ago

πŸ’‘ Feature Requests

In Progress

Billing: implement a Billing Manager permissions option

Customer reports: β€œOnly the person that opens the account right now can enter billing information. Even if you’re an admin, you cannot enter billing information for what I’ve seen. Is there a way to solve this in a future product feature?” While best practice is to restrict the ability to edit billing info in a multi-user SaaS product, the ability to assign this role is desireable and will support the use case where a user signs up with a free account, but needs someone else to input billing info to upgrade. Will also support the ability for users to transition off the team and to have multiple billing managers for backup.

cwhiteman 7 months ago

5

πŸ‘πŸ» Feedback